Vanguard editorial, in my view, belongs in the heavyweight echelon of Nigeria's commentariat. The weight of its punch is to be judged not only by the resonance of the message over the years; but also its economy of phrase - the uncanny facility to say a lot in so few words, packing so much into so little a space.
But its edition of August 3 must rank among those that fall miserably short of the high value it normally espouses. In the comment entitled, "Looting of ex-President Jonathan's home", the newspaper said every thing expected against the cops-turned-burglars and those who trafficked the stolen goods.
What
would have been a fine argument against yet another iniquity of man was however
sullied when, in the next breath, it openly sought to either deny anyone the
right to outrage against Jonathan on any count whatsoever or make a villain
outright of those unable to express pity or empathy with the victim on this
matter.
It
wrote: "No decent human being can claim that what took place in ...
President Jonathan's house is excusable on any ground. All people of conscience
must rise up and condemn evil, no matter who is involved. The atmosphere of
hatred which seems to have seized the people of this country by the throat must
be made to give way to empathy for one another, as that is the only way we can
build a united, strong country."
For effect,
it reminded us of the great sacrifice GEJ made to secure democracy: "It
was due to his gentle and patriotic disposition that the nation experienced a
peaceful transfer of power from one political party to another in 2015."
In
the haste to whip up sentiments, the editorialist, alas, missed the
context and the nuance of the great heist at issue. To start
with, seeking to overplay Jonathan's 2015 concession of defeat as
reflected above is very cheap indeed. Care needs be taken against overdrawing
that goodwill account. His action then was the most honorable thing to do at
that moment, for which enough encomium has been showered on him both within and
outside our shores.
But
that can, by no means, now amount to an entitlement to pity at all
times. Nor can it possibly be tendered as adequate inoculation
against reproach or perpetual immunity against public scrutiny.
Otherwise,
we, given what is now also known about the sordid aspects of the same past,
risk enthroning a new relativity of morality with the suggestion that gross
ethical inadequacy be excused in the throes of sentimentality or being captive
to one memory.
Rather,
the intelligentsia must be seen as setting very high standards for
the society, holding all actors by a universal principle. Inherent in
that resolve is a commitment not to compromise values or lend
itself to those seeking to lower the society's ethical bar on sentiments
ranging from ethnicity to creed.
Two, there
can be no disputation as to whether Jonathan, were he another ordinary
Nigerian, would be deserving of pity over this loss of valuables. While it may
be true that most Nigerians indeed lack true love for their nation as corporate
entity, they certainly do not hate one another at inter-personal
level, as can be verified from the instinctive response of the average Nigerian
meeting complete strangers at an accident scene, for instance. He is very
unlikely to turn the other way but play the biblical Good Samaritan - lending
a hand to those in distress.
Odion |
As
a people, Nigerians are not incapable of pity when sufficiently aroused.
In
the present circumstance, the truth is that Jonathan is definitely not the guy
next door. And if we can summon courage to face the more inconveniencing
truth, many - if not most - Nigerians today would argue GEJ only just got a
mini dose of the bitter portion the nation was force-fed with under his watch
as president.
In
a poetic reversal of role, while the man from Otuoke grieved over the loss
of domestic valuables under police guard, his fellow compatriots have not
stopped bemoaning the mindless looting of their own country while Jonathan was
sentinel.
On
account of what is now known, those who wish to discount the GEJ silhouette as
only totemic of looting without limit cannot therefore be accused of being
uncharitable. The cost of plasma TVs, refrigerators and bowlers is certainly
insignificant compared to, say, the $150m (N54b) of luxury assets recently
forfeited by Diezani and co to US authorities alone. To say nothing of
estimated $15b (N5.4t) systematically stolen through Dasukigate.
Funny
enough, when the likes of then CBN governor Sanusi Lamido Sanusi were crying
out that the national exchequer was being bled to death, Jonathan took it upon
himself to parlay every national platform to vigorously defend Diezani as
hapless victim of those playing malicious political games.
When
you occupy an enviable office, he once philosophized on a national television
in her defence, enemies tell fat lies to pull you down.
So,
if some citizens are now unable to bring themselves to pity Jonathan over
the Gwarinpa burglary as the Vanguard editorial surmised, it
must be understood in the context of a nation still unable to come to terms
with the mega heist under his watch, the lurid details of which continue to
unfold with stifling pungency both at home and abroad.
In
the statement to the police, he lamented his home was "completely stripped
bare", underlining an epic betrayal of truth. Policemen asked to guard a
home chose to become the thieves themselves.
But
once the marauding vultures had been upbraided and chased away, it will be time
to censure the mother fowl for exposing her chicks to danger in the first
place. By Jonathan's own admission, the theft was only discovered last
month. The truth he was obviously too shy to share is that the property in
question was lying waste as he lives elsewhere in Abuja. That apparently left
the door ajar for the evil cops to systematically clean out the four-bedroom
duplex over the months.
Of
course, in a society where estimated 60 percent of the population is thought
homelessness and many more go to bed on empty stomach at night, that is not the
sort of secret you want to let out.
So,
had the media not become awash last week with "sensational" claims of
what went missing, it is debatable if Jonathan would not
have preferred to hush things up to avoid eyebrows being raised or some
hard questions being asked. His statement on the theft would then seem to be
motivated more by a desire to debunk the "exaggerated" claims than a
willingness to give self up for scrutiny.
Obviously
to deflect initial reports suggesting "36 Plasma television sets and 25
refrigerators", the former president detailed the haul to include only 6
flat screen TV sets, toilet seats, 3 refrigerators, doors and one gas cooker.
His statement was however conveniently silent on the reports on "bales and
bales of babanriga wears and designer suits with his names embroidered on the
inner linings".
Without
being induced, some witnesses have already volunteered accounts of what really
happened. One Mallam Shuaibu has been named as one of the buyers of the stolen
items at the popular Pankera Secon-hand Market, Abuja. One account said each
suit was auctioned for N5,000. And what a boom time it was in that corner of
the market for a long time before the secret leaked. You would see locals of
all nations and creeds trying assorted bowler hats on display and "woko"
Ijaw jumpers of many colours in the open before making a pick.
Not
surprising, the four cops implicated in the shameful conduct have since been
dismissed by the police after an orderly room trial preparatory to their being
formally prosecuted. The same way Ibrahim Bagobiri, chairman of the Pankera
Market, has been defenestrated by members for allegedly partaking in the
receipt and disposal of the stolen goods.
From
media pictures of the crime scene, it is easy to feel anger, vengeance in
the clinical severity with which the policemen-burglars violated the haven
where Jonathan once dined and slept. Literally, what remained was for the
brigands to excavate the floor tiles and the blocks to complete a furious
plunder.
Though
no one can tell for sure how long it took them to finish the pillage, since
they were reportedly posted after the former president quit Aso Rock, it is
perhaps safe to assume they had taken charge before the slime of Dasukigate
began to seep out by the twilight of 2015.
Dazed
by the stories of grand larceny that began to circulate, chances are that the
unscrupulous policemen themselves only saw Jonathan's personal effects and
household goods as their own fair portion of the elephantine loot. Ordinarily,
no one would wish to be left out when the proverbial butchered elephant is
being shared.
It
is clear Karma had passed through Gwarinpa with all its mystical
stealth.
In most bizarre circumstances, it is not about big grammar and rhetoric. The fact here is simple. Yes, Jonathan has his good and bad sides, but the looting of the residence of the former president of our country by the guards needs to be condemned in it's entirety. When and where did this happen before anywhere in the world? Those who perpetrated this act are thieves and need to be treated as such and all who support this act are "co-thieves" because "birds of the same feathers flog together".QED.Mixing up issues sometimes constitutes a problem. At times we need to treat issues separately so that we can be objective.
ReplyDelete